[UFO Chicago] New Linux Website
Rory O'Connor
rory@thewhiteroom.com
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 14:52:22 +0000
we've tried a couple local spam filtering solutions but finally ended up using a 3rd party service called Postini (http://www.postini.com/) for us and all our clients. It has worked fabulously well at filtering spam and virus emails (which clients have a nasty habit of clicking on...then of course I have to fix). There is a cost, but it's minimal and very much worth it. and it also takes the processing load off our server.
On 09 Dec 2002 15:30:49 -0500
Mike Cathey <mpcathey@catt.com> wrote:
> Peter,
>
> On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 14:52, Peter A. Peterson II wrote:
> > In case you haven't thought of this yet, be forwarned that if you ever
> > have to filter 5000 messages at once (say, after a significant crash)
> > SA will bring your box to it's *knees*.
>
> What kind of system are we talking about here (spec-wise)? Is it using
> spamd? I've ran across some alternative daemons that were supposed to
> be faster or provide more features, but I lost track of them. :\
>
> I'd be interested to know what kind of volume others on the list that
> are using SA are handling and what hardware they're running it on.
>
> I'm considering setting up a box just for filtering that would
> filter/tag/forward to the backend MX for delivery.
>
> We're a rather smallish shop. The existing MX (with procmail as the
> LDA) is handling between 170-285k messages per week, depending on how
> quickly we catch/quarantine the client machines infected with outlook
> viruses.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike
>
>
--
Rory O'Connor
rory@thewhiteroom.com
Ph: 773.907.9101
Cell: 773.620.3022